BitKan-Central Banks Will Jump-Start the Decentralization of Money
Michael J. Casey is the chairman of CoinDesk’s advisory houtvezelplaat and a senior advisor for blockchain research at MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative.
The following article originally appeared ter CoinDesk Weekly, a custom-curated newsletter delivered every Sunday exclusively to our subscribers.
Whether bitcoin or its imitators eventually achieve general ubiquity, they have already achieved success te one fundamental way: forcing humans to rethink their relationship with money and banks.
Cryptocurrencies weren’t on the ballot during Switzerland’s “sovereign money” referendum last weekend, te which Swiss citizens rejected by a ratio of three to one a proposal to end fractional reserve banking and give foot money-creation authority to the Swiss National Bankgebouw. But they were the elephant ter the slagroom.
The very presence of the crypto alternative, I believe, will eventually force economies worldwide to disintermediate banks from money, yet the onmiddellijk authors of that switch won’t be activist voters wielding ill-conceived referenda or crypto enthusiasts voting with their wallets.
The very first phase of a transition toward a true “money of the people” will be implemented by central banks themselves, striving and challenging to remain relevant ter a post-crisis, post-trust, digitally connected mundial economy.
That might disappoint adherents of the cypherpunk desire who birthed bitcoin. But the good news for those who want governments out of money altogether is that when currencies become digital and love all the bells and whistles of programmable money they will foster more intense mundial competition among themselves.
When brainy contracts can manage exchange rate volatility, for example, people and businesses involved te international trade will not need to rely solely on the dollar spil the cross-border currency of choice. This more competitive environment will ultimately open the voort to non-government digital alternatives such a bitcoin.
Backlash against CBDCs
To be sure, official enthusiasm for central bank-issued digital currency, or CBDC spil it has become known, has waned somewhat spil the old guard of central banking has dug ter its high-heeled slippers.
At the Bankgebouw of England, which spearheaded research into the idea three years ago, Governor Mark Carney has lately warned of financial instability if his institution were to directly provide digital wallets to ordinary citizens — a switch that would, ter effect, give everyone the same right to hold reserves at the central handelsbank spil regulated commercial banks.
The Canap of International Settlements a kleuter of international club for central banks has echoed Carney’s concerns, spil have other officials.
This backlash, which suggests that the handelsbank supervisory teams within central handelsbank bureaucracies have regained ascendancy overheen technologists and innovators ter their internal debates overheen CBDC, stems from a well-founded expectation: handelsbank runs would be a positivo possibility.
Why hold your money at risky, friction-laden institutions paying near-zero rente when you can store at zero risk with the central canap itself and trade it automatically with other fiat digital wallet holders?
But why, also, should wij care what happens to banks?
Banks are the problem
The only reason to promote digital fiat currencies is precisely to bypass the banks. Whether the currency is fiat or decentralized, banks are the problem. The technical, social and regulatory infrastructure upon which they operate is decades old and fraught with unnecessary compliance costs.
Banks maintain centralized, non-interoperable databases on outdated, clunky COBOL mainframes. They rely on numerous intermediaries to process payments, each managing their own, siloed ledgers that voorwaarde be reconciled against each other through time-consuming fraud-prevention mechanisms.
All thesis inefficient systems, instituted to address the problem of trust, merely add to the cost of trust te the system.
“Why, ter a digital age, can’t wij stir money around 24/7? Because wij have bad middleware, and that bad middleware is existing financial infrastructure,” says Charles Cascarilla, CEO of Paxos, which is building blockchain-based trading infrastructure for the financial system.
Ter addition, there’s the massive political risk that comes with banks’ involvement ter our payments system.
The reason why it wasgoed deemed necessary for governments to bail out the world’s banks to the tune of trillions of dollars ter 2008 wasgoed that not doing so would have thrust our very sophisticated payments systems into puinhoop. The total economy would have had a cardiac hechtenis. It’s that threat of bringing us all down with them that gives “too-big-to-fail” banks a hold overheen policymaking.
Many central bankers, still smarting from the fallout from that keerpunt, know this is the problem. Many see efectivo benefits te removing banks from payments and recognize that digital currencies can help. The question is how to get there without fomenting puinhoop.
One solution: a phased treatment overheen time. You don’t provide CBDC to everyone at very first, you begin with large non-bank financial institutions, go after it up with a certain class of large corporations, then budge to smaller businesses, and only make it available to individuals spil a last step.
Another solution: the introduction of a unique, central bank-determined CBDC rente rate. This would be an addition to the central bankgebouw toolkit for managing money supply, which presently hinges on a combination of a policy rate imposed on banks’ reserves and interventions te the two-way market for buying and selling government securities with banks.
A separate CBDC rente rate would provide a means to calibrate the flow of money inbetween banks and digital fiat wallets, potentially within a long-term project to little by little shift it from the former to the latter without overly disrupting the system.
Spil Sheila Bair, the former Chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., argued ter a latest op-ed, this fresh rente rate implement could enhance monetary policy, spil central banks could use it to either stimulate or cool the economy. By directly affecting the rate at which people’s currency holdings grow, incentives to save or spend could be directly implemented.
Still, I don’t see developed-world central banks rushing to do this. Their relationships to commercial banks are too entrenched. And, for now at least, it’s hard for many ter that system to even conceive of a monetary system that doesn’t revolve around them.
But it’s different for developing-world central banks. For too long those countries’ monetary policy has bot driven by the policies of the world’s largest central bankgebouw, the Federal Reserve. If the Fed cuts rates, foreign, inflationary money floods into their bank-centric financial systems, if it hikes rates, they face deflationary risks. Ter theory, a fiat digital currency could permit them to offset those compels.
Now, of course, all of this could go wrong. A fresh instrument for profligate governments to debase their citizens’ money does not look desirable. For proof, look no further than the rogue state of Venezuela and its fresh, centrally managed digital currency, the petro.
Yet that may also be what ultimately gives bitcoin, or some other viable altcoin, a chance to shine, especially spil Layer Two solutions commence to help with scalability and liquidity. Central banks can’t waterput the cryptocurrency genie back ter the bottle. Their potential embrace of digital fiat currencies will toebijten te an era when their citizens have a choice they can shift to thesis fresh decentralized solutions, with enlargening ease.
Whether they take overheen the world or not, the power of the market te a more open system of currency choice will mean that cryptocurrencies will hopefully play a fundamental role ter forcing thesis politicized, centralized institutions to better manage their people’s money.
The leader te blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a stringent set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests te cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.